Comments for Kirtan Desai

Comment on Audit DDL Changes by Artnette Spencer

Artnette Spencer — Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:40:20 +0000

Hello, what if i wanted to included the SQL text that was issued. How would I included that?

Comment on Informatica – Seq. Gen. performance issue by Administrator

Administrator — Fri, 27 May 2011 03:23:16 +0000

@Neel
Apologies for not replying soon enough.
I don’t understand your question at all…
could you please give an example so that i can , maybe, attempt to answer what you are asking for?

Comment on Informatica – Seq. Gen. performance issue by Neel

Neel — Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:09:01 +0000

Hi Kirtan,
If we have to deploy a map having sequence generator to other environment, is there any way we can parametrize the current val or nextval.

As once when we deployed map to QA, it had the last val stored as current val (which we ended with during unit testing).
Please suggest.

Comment on Informatica Issue by Nitin

Nitin — Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:18:06 +0000

Hi all,
I am facing a problem in Informatica. I have to execute SELECT statement stored in a flat file in informatica. I tried SQL transformation, but not sure how well it fits into the solution, i am looking for. The problem is:
I have a flat file in which i have 20 select statements for twenty different tables. Now i want to execute one select statement from the .txt file to load the output of that select stmt in to a column in target table using informatica and subsequently for remaining 19 Select stmts. So is there any way i can execute SELECT stmt from flat file.

Need your suggestion.

Thanks in advance,
Nitin

Comment on Informatica Issue by Shivam

Shivam — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 07:14:52 +0000

Hi Thanks,
I agree your words but what the are the other possibilities ,so that change control process
is also a factor keeping in mind

Thanks for your paitence in guoding me ,I appreciate it

Shivam

Comment on Informatica Issue by Administrator

Administrator — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 03:06:59 +0000

seems fine. try it out. it should work. I personally don’t like the idea of such automation. I am all for automation but change control processes are also important as a product/project matures.

Comment on Informatica Issue by Shivam

Shivam — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 02:53:29 +0000

Hi
I may be wrong on dynamic part ,just elimating columns or entities
May i know the steps to map or proceess for the desired output

Comment on Informatica Issue by Administrator

Administrator — Mon, 29 Mar 2010 01:54:54 +0000

@Shivam
How often are you expecting these changes? And why do you have to make this dynamic? What’s going to happen to all the stored procs, reports, feeds that are written based on the structure? are you going to make all of that dynamic too?

Comment on Informatica Issue by Administrator

Administrator — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 15:23:29 +0000

@Nitin
I would need more details about your mapping. but a few things you can check for are: table indexes, table locks, connections etc.
you can search for “performance tuning” on this site and see if it gives you any ideas.
let me know if you have more questions.

Comment on Informatica Issue by Shivam

Shivam — Sun, 28 Mar 2010 05:12:59 +0000

Hi kirtan this what they are expecting;–

One point to be noted that we are not looking for “runtime” manipulation of metadata for target schema or the process flow.

Based on customer specific requirements for target schema variation (elimination of columns or entities), we should be able to generate from scratch or tweak master metadata for target schema map or process flow to generate desired output. This is still considered as “design” time, just that on-site person is not using GUI tools to design the process flow rather our infrastructure will generate it.

Based on your evaluation, does Talend and Pentaho support this?

I will need to answer this from Imformatica perspective.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Our Analysis:——————

steps:—

1. Create table control_load
2. Add 3 columns like tab_name,column_name,flag
3.Develop map to generate the parameter file where flag = ‘Y’ with parameter
as INSERT statement( for those columns or table you dont want make the flag as ‘N’)
4. Develop the actual map, after source add SQL transformation and call the parameter
for Inserting to target tableflow make dymamic for SQL transformation
5.In work

two mappings one workflow, call sessions in sequential mode
it covers both scenarios
based on flag you can do that
it all depends on how you’ll set the flag

Kirtan, make changes to the steps if i m wrong
Shivam